Sora has lots of potential to get an enjoyable and intriguing moveset. But so do characters such as Corrin, Byleth, Pyra, Hero, etc.. Corrin transforms into a dragon, Byleth uses tons of unique weapons, Pyra utilizes fire strikes and transforms, and Hero has loads of charms and RNG command selection. Yet they get hated on to be"a different sword user".
My point was that it's hypocritical that people ask for characters such as Sora in this match whilst whining about characters like Pyra being"a different sword user". Because Sora would play like a sword person, despite all of the excess stuff he would bring to the table. Being a sword user isn't poor, and no personality should be criticized for this so long as they deliver an intriguing twist on the archetype.
ROB I at least sort of get. Being old enough to have existed when ROBs were a reasonably common occurrence with NES's; that thing was a piece of crap and up did not work for the most part. The 2 games he worked with were not even good on their own . It just felt weird.
You will find TONS other characters which could have filled his place quite nicely, and IMO, a LOT more suitably. Whereas characters that individuals were hyped for for many years make for relatively unpopular figures (Simon, Banjo, Ridley, Villager, etc).
Beforehand folks get so involved in the possible along with the hype. But once a character gets in, they are just another fighter in a fighting game. All that matters is them being fun or powerful to fight since
The details of the game information in https://www.acbells.com/